超聲波清洗機作為工業(yè)重要清洗設備，其清洗效率和清洗效果成為人們重點關注之事。如果工件清洗效果不佳，將影響工件的二次加工，因此，人們需研究出可監(jiān)控超聲波清洗機清洗效果的方法，確保工件清洗效果良好。根據相關研究，可采用毛玻璃片法、鋁箔測試法和超聲能量瓶檢測法檢測工件的清洗效果。

As an important industrial cleaning equipment, the cleaning efficiency and effectiveness of ultrasonic cleaning machines have become a key concern for people. If the cleaning effect of the workpiece is poor, it will affect the secondary processing of the workpiece. Therefore, it is necessary to study methods that can monitor the cleaning effect of ultrasonic cleaning machines to ensure good cleaning effect of the workpiece. According to relevant research, the cleaning effect of workpieces can be tested using the ground glass plate method, aluminum foil testing method, and ultrasonic energy bottle testing method.

在運用鋁箔測試法監(jiān)測超聲波清洗機清洗效果時發(fā)現(xiàn)，10μm的鋁箔紙在測試時受損較為嚴重，無法判斷清洗效果，而其他厚度的鋁箔測試的合格率差距相對較小。通過監(jiān)測試驗發(fā)現(xiàn)，厚度超過20μm的鋁箔紙作為檢測工具時，清洗效果更加明顯，監(jiān)測起來也更加方便。運用毛玻璃片或超聲能量瓶監(jiān)測超聲波清洗機清洗效果時發(fā)現(xiàn)，監(jiān)測物品大小并不影響監(jiān)測效果，但放置的位置會有一定影響。為了確保監(jiān)測的準確性，需要分別根據清洗時間、清洗溫度和清洗頻率設計不同的試驗組，且每組的試驗數量都達到相關要求。

When using the aluminum foil testing method to monitor the cleaning effect of ultrasonic cleaning machines, it was found that 10 μ The aluminum foil paper of m was severely damaged during testing, making it difficult to determine the cleaning effect, while the difference in pass rates for other thicknesses of aluminum foil testing is relatively small. Through monitoring experiments, it was found that the thickness exceeded 20 μ When m's aluminum foil is used as a detection tool, the cleaning effect is more obvious and monitoring is more convenient. When using ground glass sheets or ultrasonic energy bottles to monitor the cleaning effect of ultrasonic cleaning machines, it was found that the size of the monitored item does not affect the monitoring effect, but the placement position will have a certain impact. To ensure the accuracy of monitoring, it is necessary to design different test groups based on cleaning time, cleaning temperature, and cleaning frequency, and the number of tests in each group should meet the relevant requirements.

人們同時使用三種方法監(jiān)測超聲波清洗機清洗效果時發(fā)現(xiàn)，鋁箔測試法和超聲能量瓶檢測法的監(jiān)測合格率明顯低于毛玻璃片法，監(jiān)測的結果更為準確。由此可見，鋁箔測試法和超聲能量瓶檢測法更加適合于監(jiān)測超聲波清洗機的清洗效果，如果條件不允許，人們再退而求其次地選擇毛玻璃片法，并且將毛玻璃片豎放于清洗機的四角位置，提高監(jiān)測的難度。

When people use three methods simultaneously to monitor the cleaning effect of ultrasonic cleaning machines, it is found that the monitoring qualification rate of aluminum foil testing method and ultrasonic energy bottle testing method is significantly lower than that of ground glass plate method, and the monitoring results are more accurate. From this, it can be seen that the aluminum foil testing method and the ultrasonic energy bottle testing method are more suitable for monitoring the cleaning effect of ultrasonic cleaning machines. If conditions do not allow, people will choose the ground glass plate method second and foremost, and place the ground glass plate vertically at the four corners of the cleaning machine to increase the difficulty of monitoring.